Home Blog Page 47

Exploratory research – an opportunity for science and entrepreneurship

0

ȊOn 28-29.03.2022, at the “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu was held the workshop entitled Exploratory Research – Opportunity for Science and Entrepreneurship. The emergence of new models, theories and techniques under the umbrella of Complexity Science and the exponential development of computing technology has stimulated scientific research in all fields. Nanotechnologies, neuroscience and living studies in general have led to the development of new disciplines such as biomimetics, bioelectronics, biosemiotics, biogeophysics, bioinformatics. The whole body of knowledge that has accumulated in recent decades in this context has led to changes in the approach to the study of Nature.

The confinement between fundamental and applied research, exploratory research, by its very vision and mission, becomes the organic link between the university/academic environment and the entrepreneurial environment (interested in identifying niche areas (blue ocean management), new “clean” materials and technologies (inspired by Nature (biomimicry)), new techniques for assessing the quality of the environment, the relationship between Work – Man – Society, the state of individual and collective health.

The workshop was organised under the auspices of the Academy of Romanian Scientists and was attended by master students, PhD students and employers.

AOSR supports the vaccination campaign against COVID-19 and all efforts to fight the pandemic

0

The Academy of Romanian Scientists strongly supports, both scientifically and civically, the national vaccination campaign against COVID-19. From a scientific point of view, the AOSR bases its position on the analyses and conclusions of the Medical Sciences Section of its structure, which includes personalities in the field, university professors, doctors and researchers, with national and international academic and professional prestige. From a civic perspective, in view of the unprecedented seriousness of the situation generated by the new coronavirus, AOSR intends to show solidarity with the Romanian state institutions on the front line of the fight against the pandemic and to get directly involved in the joint effort made by them to protect public health through all the measures taken and through the vaccination campaign. In this scientific, civic and moral framework, members of the AOSR, leading personalities of Romanian medicine, have already been vaccinated or will be vaccinated in the coming days.

In the next interval, in addition to continuing the vaccination process at the institution, The Academy of Romanian Scientists will organize, through the Section of Medical Sciences, a series of academic events (symposia, round tables in online format) on the topic of the pandemic, scientific and administrative measures to combat it, focusing on the need for large-scale vaccination of the population. In the context of the events, special attention will be given to the COVID-19 vaccines through multidisciplinary approaches that will analyse their mechanisms of functioning, effects, benefits and possible risks.

The Academy of Romanian Scientists considers such involvement in the national effort to fight the pandemic to be its scientific and moral obligation. Such a duty becomes a priority in the face of the diversity of opinions expressed publicly in relation to the pandemic situation, which does not lack fake news, conspiracy theories, coronasceptic positions, clear attitudes against vaccination and protective measures, which lead to thwarting the fight against the pandemic. The AOSR bases its direct involvement in this national process on its institutional mission enshrined in the Statute and in the Law of Functioning, on a history in the service of Romanian science and civilization of almost a century, starting with the founding of the Romanian Academy of Sciences in 1935 by a great physician and Minister of Education, Dr. Constantin Angelescu.

Communication and Public Relations Office of the Academy of Romanian Scientists
(Contact: comunicare.aosr@gmail.com )

Excellence in scientific research awarded by the Academy of Romanian Scientists

0

On 24 September 2020, the Academy of Romanian Scientists awarded the annual prizes for the most important achievements in the fields of scientific research. In this edition, following a rigorous selection, the awards for 2018 were presented. The award ceremony took place in the hall of the “Carol I” Central University Library, in the presence of a small audience, made up of award winners and representatives of the AOSR, in compliance with the safety and protection conditions imposed by the state of alert. As in previous editions, the awards were of strictly honorary value, without involving a monetary component, representing an act of recognition and highlighting the value in science and research.

At the beginning of the event, the DIPLOMA OF EXCELLENCE was awarded to Prof. dr. eng. DAN ȘCHIOPU, Full Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists, as a tribute to his rich scientific and academic activity, on the occasion of his 90th birthday.

In the MILITARY SCIENCES SECTION, two prizes were awarded: the MAREȘAL CONSTANTIN PREZAN Prize to Florian TUCĂ, Cristache GHEORGHE, Eugen SITEANU for the book Monuments and memorial insignia dedicated to the Romanian heroes of the Great War of National Reintegration, Publishing House of the Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, 2018 and the VALENTIN ARSENIE Award to Gheorghe BOARU, Iulian Marius IORGA for the book Security of military information systems, Carol I National Defence University Publishing House, Bucharest, 2018.
The MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES section awarded the DIMITRIE POMPEIU Prize to Constantin P. NICULESCU and Lars-Erik PERSSON for the book Convex Functions and Their Applications, CMS Books in Mathematics vol. 23, xvii + 415 pp, Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.
In the PHYSICAL SCIENCES SECTION, the ȘERBAN ȚIȚEICA Prize was awarded to Dumitru MIHALACHE, Virgil BĂRAN, Bogdan CONSTANTINESCU, Onuc COZAR, Dan DASCĂLU, Alexandru I. NICOLIN, Aureliu SĂNDULESCU for the paper The Founders of Modern Physics in Romania as Seen from the Archive of Revue Roumaine de Physique, published in Romanian Journal of Physics, vol. 63, 113 (2018), Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest, 2018.
The Technical Sciences Section awarded three prizes: the HERMANN OBERTH Prize to Tudor DEACONESCU for the book Pneumatics Applied, Lux Libris Publishing House, Brasov, 2018, the MARTIN BERCOVICI Prize to Mircea IGNAT for the book Initiation into the Scientific Research, Electra Publishing House, Bucharest, 2018 and the GOGU CONSTANTINESCU Prize to Radu CORNESCU for the book Arh. Victor Ștephănescu between national style and modernism, “Andrei Saguna” Publishing House, Bucharest, 2018.
INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SECTION: the ȘTEFAN ODOBLEJA Award to Ruby SRIVASTAVA (editor) for the book Recent Development in Optoelectronic Devices and to Andreea Rodica STERIAN for the chapter “Nonlinear Dynamics in Optoelectronic Structures with Quantum Well”, IntechOpen Publishing House, 2018.
Two prizes were awarded by the HISTORICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SCIENCES SECTION: the ANDREI OȚETEA Prize to Ioan CRISTESCU, Mireille RĂDOI, Adina BERCIU DRĂGHICESCU for the book Heroines of Great Romania. Destinies from the front line, Publishing House of the National Museum of Romanian Literature, 2018 and the AURELIAN SACERDOȚEANU Prize to Laurențiu-Ștefan SZEMKOVICS for the book Documents from Constantin Brâncoveanu concerning the Brâncoveni Monastery and localities in Olt and Romanați counties (1688-1713), Publishing House of the Diocese of Slatina and Romanaților, Slatina, 2018.
Two prizes were also awarded in the ECONOMIC, LEGAL, SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SECTION: the ANGHEL RUGINĂ, Alina Mihaela DIMA (editor) prize for the book Doing Business in Europe: Economic Integration Processes, Policies, and the Business Environment, Springer International Publishing AG, 2018 and the TUDOR POPESCU Award to Verginia VEDINAȘ for Theoretical and Practical Treatise on Administrative Law, Vol.I-II, Universul Juridic Publishing House, Bucharest, 2018. The CONSTANTIN NOICA Prize of the Philosophy, Theology and Psychology Section was awarded to Adrian GORUN for the book Pedagogy and Pedagogical Doctrines, Universitaria Publishing House, Craiova, 2018.
Three prizes were awarded in the HISTORICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SCIENCES SECTION: the GHEORGHE BUZATU Prize to Valeriu AVRAM, Marius-Adrian NICOARĂ for the book In flight, towards the Great Union, Alpha MDN Publishing House, Buzău, 2018; the GRIGORE GAFENCU Prize to Iulian RUSANOVSCHI for the book The war of monuments. The fate of monuments in Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina and Transnistria from 1918-1944, Cu Drag Publishing House, Chisinau, 2018; DIMITRIE CANTEMIR Prize to Ioan VLAD for the work Brasov and the Great Union, Vol.I-III, Pastel Publishing House, Brasov, 2018.

At the 2020 Awards Gala, Prof. Dr. Eng. Adrian BADEA, AOSR President, said: “The Academy of Romanian Scientists remains consistent with its belief that education, science and culture are the factors of modernization and development of the country, the pillars of its European destiny. This is the fundamental principle of our Academy, which has been the basis of its work since its foundation in 1935 until today. Once again this year, following a selection process based on demanding and objective criteria, the AOSR wanted to reward outstanding results in the fields of scientific research as a way of appreciating the efforts and achievements of researchers. We are convinced that by recognising value, by promoting meritocracy at a broad level in Romanian society, especially by encouraging talented young people in science and research, we will succeed in contributing to the European progress of the country.”

Communication and Public Relations Office of the Academy of Romanian Scientists
(Contact: comunicare.aosr@gmail.com )

The crisis of classical reading versus the crisis of digital reading

It is already known that EUROSTAT statistics from recent years show that 90% of Romanians do not read even one book a year. The reality in question is known by those involved in education, and the press reflects this fact. In the 2019 Education Tribune it was written “The crisis of reading in school, a problem of education that should not be ignored”, and in 2021 in an article entitled “The crisis of reading” the author asks “Why not read” and “Why we have so much by many functionally illiterate ”. The Education Review – EDICT of August 2018 states that “We are at a point where the reading crisis has taken over most people.”

UNESCO was talking about the reading crisis of 25 years ago. The COVID pandemic deepened this crisis, which merged with the education crisis. On January 22, 2022, on the occasion of the International Day of Education, Antonio Guterres, Secretary General of the United Nations, said that in the last 2 years, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 31 million young people have been affected by school closures, which means , in fact, a global crisis of education (“a global learning crisis”).

In 1990, at the Faculty of Letters, in the department of Library Science and Information Science, just re-established, Gabriel Ștrempel, then the director of the Academy Library, who taught about the old Romanian Bibliography, told me, who taught Computer Science (Library Automation), very convinced that no matter how much digital information develops, the pleasure of browsing a book cannot be replaced by any computer. I did not dare to contradict him, but I was skeptical and told him that perhaps future generations would not think the same. Professor Ion Stoica, also present, tended to agree with me. Today’s reality shows that this is so! Today’s young people (and not only) prefer information in digital form! If digital information has won, I believe that digital libraries and e-books should be the counterweight to the classic reading crisis.

I remembered that in April 2016, at the Conference “Education and Culture in the Digital Age”, organized by the National Institute for Research and Development in Informatics, professionals in the field launched a manifesto for a national project to build a National Digital Library, as all culturally evolved countries have – USA, England, France, Germany, Russia, Japan, South Korea, etc. Then there were directors of large county libraries, representatives of the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, but also foreign experts, including delegates from the National Information Agency in South Korea, who also funded a pilot project for BCU. Mobile Communications magazine reflected the event in the May 2016 edition with pertinent comments on the debated ones.

Since then, over the next five years, many projects on digitizing documents and creating digital collections have been funded, but we cannot say that we have a national digital library in the true sense of the concept.

The events related to the National Reading Day made me reflect on what Gabriel Ștrempel said and I understood that there are other people who think the same, after 25 years, and this feeling of the joy of reading must be transmitted and rebuilt by any means, including declaring a National Reading Day.

It is true that digital reading does not allow you to browse pages written on paper, but you can have other advantages, you can also browse a book in a foreign language and a dictionary, an art album and a bibliography of the author of a painting on which you see it on your computer or tablet. The joy of reading can be the same, and young people can be closer to what they like, digital technology !! I think that we could include digital reading as part, in another form, of reading that can generate the joy of reading!

I know many library directors and absolutely all of them confirmed to me that they organized events on reading day to revive reading! It’s great, but it’s a continuous process, the taste and education for reading is not done in a day! The attraction for reading is the same, whether it’s on a classic or digital medium. And, as they say, education starts in the library, be it digital. Coherent digital library building, with digital books, with open access but well managed, with easy to read and navigate document systems, with the involvement of content providers but also of policy makers can be a solution to the reading and learning crisis, especially in the face of unforeseen undesirable events such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Deep sadness at the passing of Dr. Eng. Ion BASGAN, AOSR Vice-President (2010-2020)

0

The Presidium of the AOSR announces with deep sadness that on 6 April 2022, Dr. Eng. Ion BASGAN, Founding Full Member, Vice-President of AOSR (2010-2020).

Born in Bucharest on June 16, 1938, Senator Ion Basgan held executive and management positions in units belonging to the Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications, dealing with specific issues of organization, technical and commercial operation related to domestic and international transport. During this period he contributed to the drafting of instructions and regulations on the organisation and technical and commercial operation of domestic passenger and international freight transport. Certified technical expert since 1969. In 1990, he was elected deputy in the Romanian Parliament, and in the 2004-2008 legislature he was senator. He is the author and initiator, in the Romanian Parliament, of Law 31/2007 on the reorganization and functioning of the AOSR.

His scientific activity in the field of transport and management has resulted in research and determinations on road safety, quality and legality of transport, which were the basis for the development of the Republican Motor Vehicle Maintenance Regulations. His publishing activity materialized in the publication of articles in which he evokes the achievements of his father, the great Romanian inventor and scientist Ion Ștefan Basgan (24 June 1902 – 15 December 1980): The universal dimension of the inventor Ion Șt. Basgan, Focșani, July 2002; One century since the birth of the inventor Ion Șt. Basgan, Economist of 12.02.2007. He is the author/co-author of the following books: General Conditions for the Carriage of Goods in International Traffic – 1975; Evolution of Transport, Means of Transport, Organisation and Management in the European Context – vol. I-II, Conphys Publishing House, Râmnicu Vâlcea, 2002-2003; Wars of the Sons of Light, Monitorul Oficial Publishing House, 2006; Encyclopedia of Universal Freemasonry, ed. 2007, vol. I-II, Alma Publishing House, 2007.

He was a founding member of the General Association of Technical and Accounting Experts of Romania, founding member and president of the “Ion Basgan” Foundation, founding member of the Sustainable Development Forum – Romania Horizon 2020, member of the General Association of Engineers of Romania, member of the Scientific Council of the National Institute for the Study of Totalitarianism, founding member of the Romanian Pantheon Foundation, under the aegis of the Romanian Academy.
Our Academy loses a valuable member and a colleague we will always remember.

Sincere condolences to the family! God rest his soul!
Bucharest, 6 April 2022

Problems of Romanian higher education

Prof. dr. eng. Adrian Badea, President of the Academy of Romanian Scientists

I was very happy when, a few days ago, I learned about the debate organised by the joint Senate and Chamber of Deputies Education Committees on the role of education in Romania’s development.
After more than 53 years of activity in the Polytechnic University of Bucharest, of which 10 years I was head of department, 6 years dean, 6 years pro-rector and more than 5 years director of the doctoral school, I would certainly have a lot to say. As I know that I can only spare 5-7 minutes in the plenary session, I have put together a few pages this weekend, which may interest some colleagues.

  1. Quality of students, level of education
    A systemic problem concerns the decline in quality in pre-university education. As a trend, the quality and efficiency of education decreases as education cycles progress. In high school, there are problems with learning, with the level of assimilation, in the fundamental subjects, especially the hard sciences. Some baccalaureate graduates who become students lack the necessary knowledge and skills for university level. It requires additional training, the recovery of notions that should have been assimilated in high school. The situation causes delay, inconsistency and lack of continuity in the preparation process.
  2. Reduction / Suspension of the selection process for access to higher education

In the case of faculties that have experienced or are still experiencing a decline in the number of students – due to competition between higher education institutions or a decrease in the attractiveness of the fields covered – the lack of a selection process for candidates for access to university, access on the basis of competitive entrance examinations alone, is a problem for higher education. Access to student status for underprepared young people leads to a decrease in the level, quality and efficiency of education. A particular problem is engineering education. In the next 5-10 years there will be an acute shortage of engineers on the labour market across Europe. These years, the last generations to enter the labour market on the basis of assignments are retiring and there will be an acute shortage of specialists. Unfortunately, the economic environment is also to blame because often the level of pay is not the fairest. Their involvement in supporting technical education is also low. When they miss it, they will probably change their policy, but it will take a long time to reach normality, as the inertia of the education system has been there for at least 10 years. Today’s low interest among young people in science and engineering leads to a lack of competition for admissions, a drop in the level of applicants accepted for studies and of course the output will be lower. In order to bring young people closer to science, AOSR, together with the major technical universities, proposes a programme to bring high schools closer to explaining to students the main laws and technologies of science in their own language to show them that science is not ‘hard’, but beautiful and open to new paths.

  1. Licensing – too many programs
    The total number of undergraduate degree programmes in all fields in all Romanian universities is 3389, of which 838 for technical fields. According to ISCO (International Standard Classification of Occupations) there are only about 20 fields/qualifications for higher technical education (The qualification covers a given field of the ISCO core group or a family of occupations in the core group). We have gone from a pre-1989 super-specialisation and standardisation to an exaggerated abundance without international and labour market correspondence. We also did not understand and did not apply correctly the Bologna philosophy, with the 3 cycles: bachelor – basic training, master – specialization, doctorate – specific deepening through research.
    In relation to the undergraduate degree in engineering education, the award of the engineering degree after 4 years (240 ECTS), which I admit I have also taken, means that this degree is not recognised internationally unless the studies are accompanied by a Master’s degree (the international engineering degree requires a minimum of 300 ECTS). The awarding of the engineering diploma after 4 years allows graduates to be employed on the Romanian labour market, which creates a break for master and doctoral studies respectively. Thus master’s studies have in many cases turned into evening or part-time courses. The long duration of the full 6-year engineering studies discourages young people and there is now a growing reluctance. Personally (this is not an AOSR opinion, as our debate on this issue will take place in April) I opt for a form: 3 years bachelor and 2 years master, with the removal from the law of the limitation of 50% of bachelor graduates to master students. This form is also used in most EU countries. At the same time, the number of weekly hours of classroom activity, 26-28 hours/week (regulated by ARACIS), is very high. Up to 40 hours per week leaves 14-12 hours of individual study. We have practically the same, if not more, classroom study time as in the last century, when documentation possibilities were extremely limited and everything was based on the knowledge disseminated at school. Today, information/documentation opportunities are different, and the balance between classroom and individual study has reversed. At MIT – USA it’s basically 15 hours in class and 25 hours of individual study! But this has to be cultivated from elementary/primary/high school in Romania!
    At undergraduate level in particular, dropping out remains an active phenomenon. There are still a large number of students who do not complete their undergraduate studies for various reasons. Among these, one very important one is the lack of career development prospects in the field of specialisation. A priority for the system is to analyse the causes and take measures to reduce drop-out.
  2. Mismatch between curricula and labour market requirements
    There is still a mismatch in university education in terms of the relationship between study content and labour market requirements. There are undergraduate programmes that are run by virtue of inertia, promoting the same content, overtaken by dynamic and rapid developments in the labour market. A process of continuous redefinition and adaptation at curriculum level is needed to ensure that university education meets socio-economic needs, that curricula are in line with these needs, developments and trends. Economic agents must also contribute materially to the cost of training specialists, not only through taxes paid, but also through pre-contracts concluded directly with universities.
  3. Specialist practice sometimes a formal approach
    Specialised practice in the undergraduate cycle is, in many cases, formal. However, the internship is of fundamental importance for the students’ training in the field and their professional integration. There is a need for partnerships between higher education institutions and employers, consortia between universities and companies relevant to the labour market, the development of effective internships and traineeships, and a scholarship scheme for future employment of graduates in the institutions. I remember how hard the management of Politehnica Bucharest managed to impose a 4-month individual internship at the end of the third year. We were afraid we wouldn’t have enough practice places. Today there are hundreds of cooperation protocols with economic agents, who want to receive students for 4 months. I wonder how many people would want it if this internship was for a semester like the Engineering Schools in France. I think this is all down to the university management, some of whom feel that this is a ‘loss’ of teaching standards.
  4. Master’s degree – redundancy compared to bachelor’s degree?
    One problem is the relationship between the bachelor and master cycle. There should be a logical continuity, in the sense of evolution and focus on specific themes, the Master’s being a cycle of specialisation. In many cases, Master’s programmes repeat subjects already studied at undergraduate level. This creates a redundancy that undermines the effectiveness of the Master’s degree as a specialisation and qualification programme, fundamental in the academic and professional preparation of the student. Also, as I pointed out above, the employment of bachelor’s graduates makes the master’s degree no longer really a second cycle of university training, but more a kind of “advanced studies”, which we have abandoned due to their inefficiency.
  5. Avoidance of the teaching profession by graduates
    The teaching profession remains an unattractive prospect for most graduates. This is due to the modest salary conditions offered by the teaching profession, especially in pre-university education. The avoidance of the department affects, in particular, the field of exact sciences, fundamental disciplines such as mathematics, computer science, physics, chemistry, etc. The phenomenon generates a critical situation where these subjects are covered by substitutes, sometimes even unqualified substitutes, throughout the education system, especially in rural areas. There are also such difficulties in Bucharest and other big cities. Substitute filling leads to a decrease in the quality and efficiency of education.
    The situation is no better in university education. Pay levels are also an issue. If for lecturers and especially professors we can perhaps talk about a certain degree of acceptability, at the lower grades, especially assistants, salaries are unacceptable (2500 lei net), which does not encourage graduates with good performance to stay in the university and it will end up what has already happened in pre-university education, where they often hire those who can not find work elsewhere!
  6. Involving technology in education and research
    A major need in education remains the increasingly complex and substantial integration of technology into teaching-learning and research activities. There is still a conservative mentality in many parts of the system, reluctant to embrace the new, to innovate, to involve digital tools in education.
  7. Doctorate in free fall
    A fundamental problem in the current structure of university studies is that of doctoral studies in the Bologna System. It is designed as a continuation of university studies. The reality shows that, for various reasons, in particular because doctoral students are integrated into the labour market, the doctoral internship remains more of a wish, the full-time doctorate being, in fact, a doctorate without attendance. I have more than 25 years of experience as a PhD supervisor, I have supervised 51 PhD students who became PhDs, 14 of them in cotutelle with universities in France and Italy. I was until recently the director of a doctoral school and for more than 15 years I have been a member of the CNADTCU, 4 years as vice-chairman of the Council of this institution, so I hope I am aware of the evolution of this form of education.
    All over the world, PhD students and postdocs are the driving force behind research in universities, provided they work a minimum of 8 hours in research laboratories. Those of us who have worked or had PhD students in these universities know that the working hours are 9-10 hours a day and sometimes also on Saturdays or Sundays in “continuous fire” laboratories. This is only possible if they have a decent scholarship. It has been proven that this was also the case in our country during the period of the POSDRU European scholarships, when PhD students or post-docs had acceptable scholarships for all three years of study. We had 8 PhD students at that time, all of them finished in the best conditions and are now teachers. Unfortunately, this “miracle” did not last long either, as the failure rate of PhD students sometimes exceeds 50%. How can we imagine that a good bachelor and master graduate would want to do a doctorate with frequent, because there is no other form of master, without any scholarship (50%) or with a very small scholarship, compared to his offers of employment or doctorate in a foreign university, this even in the context that research is underfunded and most of the leaders no longer have research topics from which they could fund doctoral students. One solution for very good PhD students would be to employ them, by some artifice, as fixed-term assistants, but the high teaching load, which takes up a lot of their time at the beginning of the course, means that they delay the completion of their thesis.
    In France, PhDs get a government grant of 1450 (20% higher than the minimum wage) or 1800 euros, which is paid half by the government and half by the business sector. The doctoral topic is chosen by mutual agreement between the university and the economic agent, which has the advantage that, on the one hand, it solves a technical problem and, on the other hand, at the end of three years it has a well-trained doctor of science.
    There is only one solution – adequate funding for doctoral fellowships and the relaunch of research.
  8. Teachers – the disappearance of assistants
    Under the provisions of the current education law, which requires a doctoral degree for access to the teaching career, difficulties arise with regard to the position of university assistant. People with a doctorate are of an age at which they aspire to a higher teaching degree. The crisis in the position of academic assistant is causing problems in teaching and research. One solution could be that in France, where there are no longer titles of assistant and lecturer/chief of thesis, and after completing the doctorate a young person is directly employed by national competition as a lecturer, and the post of professor has several grades, with the application, laboratory and project classes being largely held by doctoral students.
  9. The bureaucratisation of education
    Bureaucratisation is not only a feature of education, but those who have had or have had senior positions in education know how many thousands of man-hours are wasted on often useless reporting. Funding and assessment in education is mainly based on numbers/counts, which does not encourage quality. And often these figures do not reflect reality either. For example, the number of places financed by the state budget remains practically unchanged, while the population is decreasing demographically, the number of high school graduates is decreasing, many are going abroad! Why wouldn’t these figures decrease and increase individual funding? This would obviously increase competition, hence quality! Why do we have to report a lot and with questionable quality? ARACIS, for example, requires for accreditation a lot of information, often useless to assess the quality of a study programme by real specialists. The funding system is also unnecessarily complicated, asking for dozens of pieces of data for a funding difference of a few percent. And the system of rules for habilitation and promotion are also riddled with figures, from which we should reveal the quality of candidates. But the evolution over time of those appointed as doctoral supervisors, lecturers or professors shows us that sometimes numbers can be deceiving. How did the teachers of the period between the two world wars, but also our teachers, manage to choose their team of collaborators without analysing too many figures, but by knowing the professional training of the candidates and their ethical and character qualities? Most of the time they were not wrong and so they created great teaching and research schools.
  10. The need for a modern law
    A new education law is needed, a modern, up-to-date, European law that responds to the reality of education and research today, to the demands of quality, efficient and competitive education, to developments in knowledge and technology, to the needs of the socio-economic environment and societal requirements.
  11. Funding education and research
    Education and research remain under-funded areas. The 6% of GDP target set by law, which declares education a national priority, remains a distant horizon. In terms of funding, the worst situation is in research. Research is still an under-funded field, which undermines its chances to develop, to achieve notable results, to become internationally relevant. It is a question of political will and I am convinced that this is the only way Romania can become a country with a competitive economy and a truly European standard of living.
  12. The position of Romanian universities in international rankings
    An important problem of Romanian university education is the low ranking of many Romanian universities in major international rankings. The situation is explained by the insufficient level of scientific research carried out in higher education institutions, research results being an essential criterion in their evaluation and ranking in international rankings. A relatively short-term solution would be to group universities into larger structures. This method has been used by the great schools of Paris or the INSA engineering schools. A Consortium: Wouldn’t the Polytechnic University of Bucharest, the Technical University of Construction, the University of Architecture, the University of Oil and Gas and the University of Medicine and Pharmacy and the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine be in a much better position in the university rankings? I am convinced that it would bring other advantages to these universities without essentially eroding their identity.
  13. Youth migration, loss of human resources
    The exodus of talented young people – students, graduates, PhDs, researchers, professionals – is creating a serious shortage of qualified human resources in academic education, scientific research and professional fields. The brain drain phenomenon, although natural in certain limits, present in other countries, but carried out to a large extent in our country, affects the field of scientific research and, at a broader level, the development of the country. Measures are needed to create an attractive framework for integrating young people with potential into research and professional scenarios in Romania.

AOSR DEBATES – EDITION III – Good governance and resilience to hybrid threats

0

On 22 November 2017, in the Marble Hall of the National Military Circle, took place the debate “GOOD GOVERNANCE AND RESILIENCE AGAINST HYBRID THREATS – A PRIORITY AT NATIONAL LEVEL”, under the auspices of the Academy of Romanian Scientists. The debate was attended by representatives of the Presidential Administration, the Government and the Romanian Parliament, political leaders and decision-makers, specialists in the field of military science, experts in governance and defence policy, members of the academic world, scientific researchers, representatives of civil society, academics and students. The meeting thus brought together qualified participants with expertise in the fields under discussion, authorities and decision-makers, which created the necessary conditions for an event with a pronounced specialist character. The debate was organised by the Academy of Romanian Scientists through the Military Sciences Section.

Through the debate Good Governance, a way to increase resilience to hybrid threats, AOSR has launched in the public environment, for reflection, analysis and qualified action, a topic of exceptional importance for the Romanian state and for Romanian society as a whole. The importance of the topic is obvious nowadays, against the background of international developments in Europe, the Middle East, the Far East and other regions of the world, in an era marked by tensions, instability, secessionist tendencies, frozen or ongoing conflicts, migration, wars, terrorism and serious threats to the security of states and global peace and security. The means involved in these critical phenomena today involve a great diversity in relation to traditional approaches – this diversity includes the processes of influence, information intoxication, discrediting, manipulation, etc. -, leading to concepts and phrases such as “hybrid warfare”, “hybrid threats”, etc.

New strategies and methods, the variety of means that are used in today’s offensive processes and acts of aggression pose new challenges to states, their national security, international relations and peace. Against the backdrop of all these developments in today’s world, taking into account its geographical location, proximity to conflict zones, points of potential conflict, geo-strategic, historical, political and economic data that define it, Romania must assess its vulnerabilities and external and internal threats in order to increase its resilience to potential risks and ensure national security. Under these circumstances, resilience and national security must be, more than ever, an absolute priority of any governance, which calls for strategies, initiatives and synergistic actions at the level of state institutions.

Within an overall framework of broad thematic coverage, the debate on Good Governance as a way to increase resilience to hybrid threats prioritised the following points:
– Hybrid aggression physiognomy;
– Increasing national resilience to the full spectrum of threats;
– The specific components and directions of good governance;
– The relationship between good governance and national resilience;
– Reducing social system vulnerabilities and increasing resilience;
– The importance of security culture for increasing resilience.

The event was opened by Prof. Dr. Eng. Adrian Badea, President of the Academy of Romanian Scientists and initiator of the “AOSR Debates” project, who revealed the importance of the topic in the current geopolitical framework, defined by tensions and conflicts, in a world marked by violence, military aggression, wars and terrorism. The theme and the realities defined by it, namely hybrid threats, are of particular importance for Romania, which is located in a highly sensitive geographical and geo-political area, with developments that entail a series of risks and vulnerabilities. Resilience and national security, Professor Badea stressed, must therefore be a priority objective of state institutions, a permanent concern of theirs in the context of regional and global instability, the diversification of means of influence and the paradigm shift in the conduct of international relations and conflicts.

The discussions were moderated by Gen. (r) Prof. Teodor Frunzeti, President of the Military Sciences Section of the Academy of Romanian Scientists, who proposed the theme of the debate and coordinated the organization of the event. The debate was structured in alternating sessions of lectures and dialogue between participants, during which questions and opinions were formulated.

The lecture session included a series of substantial presentations by decision-makers in the state apparatus and authority representatives in the fields covered by the theme of the meeting:
– Ion Oprișor, Presidential Adviser, Head of National Security Department – Presidential Administration;
– Roberta Alma Anastase, MP – Vice-Chairwoman of the European Affairs Committee of the Chamber of Deputies;
– Raed Arafat, State Secretary – Ministry of the Interior;
– General Nicolae-Ionel Ciucă, Chief of Defence Staff – Ministry of National Defence;
– Gen. Ionel Sorinel Vasilca, Director – Special Telecommunications Service;
– Chief Superintendent of Police Cristian Stoica, Director, Directorate of Immigration – General Inspectorate for Immigration;
– Alexandru Cumpănașu – President of the National Coalition for the Modernization of Romania;
– Conf. Dr. Adi Mustață – “Carol I” National Defence University (Good governance through evidence-based decisions. The case of behavioural economics);
– Conf. Dr. Aliodor Manolea (Ways to increase resilience to the hybrid threats of Transcendent Warfare – Transpersonal Warfare);
– Gen. Prof. Dr. Constantin Mincu, Full Member of AOSR (Good Governance and Defence of the Country 1990-2017);
– Gen. Prof. Dr. Anghel Andreescu, Full Member of AOSR (Good Governance, the sure solution for progress in Romania);
– Col. Dr. Eugen Siteanu, Corresponding Member AOSR (Good Governance and Countering Hybrid Threats);
– Col. Dr. Anatol Munteanu, AOSR Associate Member (Conflicts and Hybrid War in Transnistria).

The interventions of the participants analysed, from specific positions, the phenomenon of hybrid threats, how they involve Romania’s security and stability, presented the strategies, measures and initiatives implemented to counter the threats and to ensure the country’s security and put forward a series of proposals to address the field, at conceptual, political and practical levels. Beyond the diversity of perspectives in analysing the phenomenon, the opinions expressed were convergent in the idea of the need and priority of increasing resilience to hybrid threats through good governance, itself a national necessity.

By concentrating the participation of decision-makers, experts and specialists in the field, academics from higher education (National Defence University “Carol I”) and scientific researchers, the debate Good governance, a way to increase resilience to hybrid threats was conducted at an academic and highly expert level. The positions, ideas, initiatives and proposals formulated during the debate will be summarised in a final document, which will contain the main conclusions of the meeting and will be submitted to the state institutions. The papers presented will be published in the scientific journal of the Military Section of the Academy of Romanian Scientists.

The event is part of the “AOSR DEBATES” Project, initiated by the Academy of Romanian Scientists in 2017, through which the institution aims to hold a series of meetings and discussions, with the participation of policy makers, decision makers, representatives of academic and educational environments, scientists, researchers, experts, specialists, students, members of civil society, etc., on topics of priority interest for Romania today and for the future of the country. Through the “AOSR Debates” project, the organizing institution intends to constitute an agora of public and academic personalities, of representatives of Romanian society in its diversity, a space for dialogue on major issues, ideas and solutions and, last but not least, a framework for dialogue between generations. The fundamental objective of the Project is to create an academic, scientific, cultural and civic forum in which to identify and promote solutions for the development and affirmation of Romania in the European Union and the world.

Scientific research, academic education, innovation, development, youth support – priorities of the Academy of Romanian Scientists for 2020-2024

0

On 26 May 2020, at the end of the 2016-2020 mandate, the General Assembly of the Academy of Romanian Scientists took place. Given the pandemic alert status, the event took place online via videoconference. The agenda included: presentation of the Scientific Report of the AOSR for 2019, the Financial Report for 2019, presentation by the candidate for President of the Management Plan, discussion, secret ballot for the election of the AOSR Presidium and new full, honorary and corresponding members.

The scientific activity of the AOSR in 2019 included scientific research projects, the National Scientific Spring Conference 2019, the National Scientific Autumn Conference 2019, the AOSR Debates, the monthly conference series “The Values of Femininity”, the awarding of the Academy of Romanian Scientists’ Prizes for 2017, studies, research and scientific communications carried out by AOSR members and presented either at the institution’s events or at other national and international events. The AOSR’s research and development programme in 2019 consisted of 23 research projects carried out by the sections, which resulted in more than 40 articles listed on ISI or indexed in other international scientific databases.

The recognition of this scientific activity is confirmed by the prestigious international ranking SCIMAGO- Elsevier, which evaluates universities and research institutions worldwide and ranks AOSR 8th among research institutions in Romania. It should be noted that in this international ranking, in the first 800 positions in world, from the academic structures, only the Romanian Academy (676th place) and the AOSR (794th place) appear, although the AOSR has only received between 2-3% of the total funds allocated from the state budget to finance the academies established by law each year, and this year it has no budgetary funding at all. The full report can be found here: https://www.aosr.ro/wp-content/uploads/RAPORT%20AOSR%202020%20SITE%20(1)_compressed.pdf

At the General Assembly, the candidate for the position of President of the AOSR, Prof. Dr. Eng. Adrian Badea – President for the 2016-2020 term – presented his Management Plan for the period 2020-2024. The new Plan is structured around nine priority lines of action: Scientific life; Dissemination of knowledge; Human resources; Supporting and attracting young people to science; Scientific expertise; Partnerships/collaborators; Internationalisation; Material base; Management. The plan provides for the development of scientific activity, essential for an institution such as the AOSR, through its own scientific conferences, national and international conferences, scientific debates, research plans at section level, the development and diversification of the activity of the Constantin Angelescu Institute for Advanced, Interdisciplinary Research (ICAI), by promoting partnerships between it and other research units (universities, research institutes, economic agents, local and central government structures), increasing the scientific visibility of all members of the Academy by increasing the number of scientific publications, especially in prestigious journals.

An important point of the Management Plan is the relationship with young people and the concern to ensure quality education for them. This calls for a reform of science teaching from the earliest years of school, in high school and then in universities. The following lines of action for the AOSR are outlined: Involvement and taking a public stance in the drafting of the school curriculum by the MEC for pre-university education, but also in the improvement of teaching technology; continuation and development of the “Creativity” circle for students by extending it to branches in the country, especially where there is a recognized tradition (Iasi, Timisoara, Brasov, Cluj); organising meetings/conferences in schools and universities to popularise scientific fields in which AOSR has real expertise; setting up a “Creativity Prize” for young people (pupils or students), to be awarded annually together with the Scientica Foundation; developing on-line teaching resources for pupils and students, in collaboration with other partner universities. The AOSR wishes to address as a priority students in rural areas, where the quality of science teaching leaves much to be desired in many cases, and the chances of university training of this school population, which has been an essential source of scientists in the modern history of Romania, have decreased alarmingly. Another issue of concern for the AOSR in this chapter is the exodus of young people, the brain drain, which the institution intends to address in the coming period in a series of events.

The management priorities include the development of partnerships with universities, institutes and prestigious research centres. In the same framework, the internationalisation of the AOSR’s work is essential to increase the institution’s prestige and visibility. Some of the measures set out in this section: Strengthening links with AOSR honorary members abroad (about 100 members); building on the partnership signed with the Shanghai Academy of Sciences; increasing the number of bilateral partnerships by contacting other Academies of Sciences in the world; transforming the AOSR New York branch into the AOSR US branch, setting up branches in other countries; strengthening links with the AOSR Chisinau branch, which has members of real scientific value; initiating steps for AOSR participation in international science networks. The Management Plan for 2020-2024 can be found here: https://www.aosr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Plan-Managerial-ACADEMIA-OAMENILOR-DE-STIINTA-DIN-ROMANIA-2020-mai.pdf

At the General Assembly, the new AOSR leadership for the 2020-2024 term was voted in and new members were welcomed. The vote was cast online on a specially designed, high-security, technologically advanced platform. The electronic voting system built ensured the confidentiality and anonymity of the vote, with each member having their own token transmitted online by the system to access the voting system. AOSR is the first Academy in Romania to implement this modern voting system. Following the vote, was re-elected as President of the AOSR Prof. Dr. Eng. Adrian Badea. The new Scientific Presidium of the AOSR is composed of Prof. Dr. Ing. Adrian Badea – President of AOSR, prof. univ. dr. eng. Doina Banciu – Vice-President, c.s. I Doru-Sabin Delion – Vice-President, prof. univ. dr. eng. Petru Andea – scientific secretary. New members have been welcomed to the AOSR in several categories: honorary members, full members, corresponding members. As full members, the institution was joined by personalities of Romanian academic education and science: Vasile Drăgan, Adrian Olimpiu Petrușel, Ioana Demetrescu, Gheorghe Onișoru, Anton Hadăr, Sorin Rugină, Grigore Tinică.

Communication and Public Relations Office of the Academy of Romanian Scientists
(Contact: comunicare.aosr@gmail.com )

“We honour the centenary of the Great Union and our historical past by what we are doing today for the future of Romania, for the national identity and the values of Romanian civilization”

Interview with prof. univ. dr. eng. Adrian Badea, President of the Academy of Romanian Scientists

Posted by Prof. univ. dr. Sorin Ivan | Dec. 19, 2018 | Dialogues |

President Adrian Badea, one of the institutions intensely concerned with the celebration of the Centenary of the Great Union and the significance of this great celebration of all Romanians is the Academy of Romanian Scientists. This is evident from the events you have organised so far, which we know will be followed by others before the end of the year. How do you explain this concern of the AOSR to celebrate the Centenary on such a scale and complexity?
Adrian Badea: In general, I avoid using big words, considering that important things require a certain stylistic sobriety. In this case, there is only one answer, and I say it openly: we have been driven to approach the Centenary, as we have done throughout this special year, by a sense of duty. The duty we owe and feel towards our history and our country, towards the generations of young people who have the right to know their past and their identity, who have the right to aspire and to have a good future. And also a duty to our own conscience. For me, celebrating the great events of national history is a duty of conscience. I would like to make a nuance within the term “celebrate”. Of course, celebration implies joy, gestures, a certain festive, celebratory air, which all have their role and purpose. Let us not forget that the academic anthem, with long traditions in medieval university Europe, urges us to rejoice, Gaudeamus igitur. But that’s not all. In my view, celebration does not mean festivity, it should not be just a formal, meaningless event, dressed up in gala clothes. By celebration I see a deep and complex understanding of the historical event in question, a way of trying to highlight its exemplary meanings and meanings, of learning from the lesson it offers us, of honouring it and cherishing it in its substance. This is my conviction and that of my colleagues in the Academy of Romanian Scientists, whose members include prestigious historians. This is the vision that underpins the series of events dedicated to the Great Union, brought together in the Centenary Programme.

Please refer to the Centenary Programme. What does it include and what have you achieved from what you set out to do?
Adrian Badea: It is a complex programme of national and international scope, structured in two main sections: Scientific Events, Debates, International Conferences and Publishing of books, proceedings volumes, digital works. It began on January 8, 2018 with a lecture by Ambassador Constantin Vlad, “The 14 Points of American President Woodrow Wilson, an iconic document for the 20th century. Impact in our time and significance in our contemporaneity”, and continued with symposia dedicated to Eminescu, seen not only as the National Poet, but also as the precursor of the Great Union, in the country and abroad, national and regional debates, AOSR spring and autumn conferences, traditional events of our institution, with very good results in terms of scientific research. In this context, I would highlight the debate “The Union of Bessarabia with Romania – an act of historical justice, a fundamental step towards the achievement of the Great Union”, which took place at the end of March at the Palace of Parliament, a real history lesson. Another debate in the same programme, on the theme “School, Church, Army – institutions with a fundamental role in the achievement of the Great Union”, took place recently, in November, in the Marble Hall of the National Military Circle. Also in the field of events, we initiated a very special project, “Dialogue of Generations – Meetings with High School Students”, under the aegis of which we held a meeting with the students of Ion Creanga National High School in Bucharest on the theme “Knowledge of national history, the way to understand the present and build the future”. With regard to the other component of the Centenary Programme, under the aegis of the AOSR, books written by historians, established authors, dedicated to the Great Union and the entire historical framework of the era, including the First World War, the Paris Peace Conference, the Treaty of Trianon, developments following the recognition of the Great Union, etc., have appeared and continue to appear. In addition, there are a number of reprints of works of special historical importance, also produced under the aegis of the Centenary. I would highlight here the editorial project “One hundred years in one hundred books”, coordinated by Prof. Ioan Scurtu, PhD, the work One Hundred Years of Romanian Diplomacy, written by ambassadors and university professors Constantin Vlad and Ion M. Anghel and, last but not least, a very interesting project of undeniable usefulness, the digital platform “Virtual Dictionary of the Great Union”, under the coordination of Prof. Doina Banciu.

Recently, as you mentioned, you organised a debate at the National Military Circle, dedicated to the role of the Church, the Army and the School in the achievement of the Great Union. What was discussed and what conclusions were drawn from the event?
Adrian Badea: The debate “School, Church, Army – institutions with a fundamental role in the achievement of the Great Union” was a large-scale event, which brought together historians, soldiers, clergy representatives, teachers, personalities of Romanian culture and public life. The lectures at the event focused on the role of each of these institutions in our history, in the process of the establishment of Modern Romania, during the First World War and in the achievement of the Great Union. There were substantial interventions, particularly interesting both in terms of information, some of them unpublished, and in terms of perspective and interpretation of the facts of history. Of course it is not the place here to go into the details of the event, but it is important to underline that the diversity of the ideas expressed can be subsumed into a general conclusion, namely that the School, the Church and the Army played a major role in the history of Modern Romania and in the achievement of the Great Union. The school brought the Romanian people to the light of knowledge and awakened national consciousness in the souls and minds of Romanians in all Romanian provinces. The School also gave blood sacrifice in wars and especially in the First World War through teachers and professors who sacrificed themselves for the country and for the ideal of Unification. The Church was the permanent support and refuge of the people, educated and enlightened the peasants, instilled faith and hope in them, strengthened their souls and accompanied them everywhere, including on the front of the War of Independence and the great war that led to the achievement of the national ideal of the Great Union. The Romanian Army has always served the country with heroism and sacrifice, has put the homeland above everything and, through its soldiers, through the sacrifice of millions of heroes and martyrs, mostly peasants, led the country to victory. The Romanian Army played a crucial role in the achievement of the Great Union and, further on, in its subsequent defence, after the end of the First War, during the negotiations and treaties. I would summarize by saying that the three institutions, the Church, the School and the Army, are the pillars of our nation, of Romanian civilization.
We are fast approaching the apotheosis of the Centenary, 1 December 2018, a century since the Great Union. What should, in your view. and the institution you lead, the Academy of Romanian Scientists, to understand from this celebration? What are the deeper meanings of the historical event for our world today and how should we live them as a nation?

As I said earlier, we must not limit ourselves to mere celebration. We need to extract the fundamental meanings from the events we celebrate and learn from them. It is a way of reactualising the past in the consciousness of the present, of assuming history with its great moments, with its founding events. The First World War and the Great Union convey an essential message: when they had a great project, a national project, the Romanians knew how to act to achieve it. The Great Union and its result, Greater Romania, is the most important project in the history of Romanians. A grandiose project, accomplished with dignity, awareness of the assumed identity, love of country, spirit of sacrifice and sacrifice. The series of events in the second decade of the last century must be seen in the light of the great objective of liberating the Romanians from the yoke of the temporary empires and uniting them into a single country. This is why Romania entered the war, why our soldiers fought and gave their blood for the fulfilment of this historical dream, the magnificent ideal of union. It is true that they had wise leaders, patriotic politicians, among whom the figure of Ionel Brătianu shines and will always shine in the sky of our history, great generals such as Constantin Prezan, priests, intellectuals, the elite of Romanian society at that time. This elite achieved the fundamental metamorphosis of a dream into a national project of immediate order: the Great Union. Well, from here we must learn and know that we have had great moments in our history, not only in the distant, but in the modern and contemporary history, when, through intelligence, courage, dignity and a high patriotic consciousness, we have achieved what seemed impossible. Because, since Michael the Brave, the union of all Romanians in one country has remained a utopia. The lesson of history is simple: when the Romanian people set their mind to something, they succeed in fulfilling their dream. But to do this, they must have a proposal, identify a fundamental project, have visionary and patriotic leaders, and act in full synergy and unity towards achieving the goal. The knowledge of history, of these moments of great national achievement is a moral support for today’s people, to support and motivate them in the process of building the future, the Romania of tomorrow. Returning to this important act of our history, I believe that we honour the Centenary of the Great Union and our historical past by what we are doing today for the future of Romania, for our national identity and the values of Romanian civilisation.

You talk about duty, conscience, national identity, dignity, national ideal. Are these concepts current in the Romanian world? What place do they occupy in Romania’s consciousness today?
Adrian Badea: I like to think that they exist, somewhere, in the deep consciousness of Romanians. It is true that our current world is not the ideal framework for their awareness, assumption and manifestation. We are, unfortunately, divided, we are a divided society, dominated by different, sometimes contradictory, interests and tendencies, a world in which discord sometimes becomes more prominent than concord and harmony. Such a reality cannot be the breeding ground for the concepts I was talking about. It is rather a barren land, from which nothing good grows, but only poisoned fruit, quarrels, conflicts, rivalries and a permanent state of tension, which does no one any good. But I would like to believe that we have, as individuals and as a nation, the reason, the intelligence and the resources to bring these fundamental notions to light and, in their light, to shape a sense of evolution, with the magnificent model of history, the Great Union, as a guiding star, and, based on this model, a cardinal point of our becoming, fixed in the not too distant future.

It’s a process that now, from the world and atmosphere we live in, seems extraordinarily difficult. Is it utopian? Can we achieve it? How can we do this?
Adrian Badea: I and others who think like me, gathered in our institution, believe that the main means by which we can recover notions such as conscience, dignity, national identity and others like them is education. Our main mission as intellectuals, as teachers, is to educate young people, from an early age, in the spirit of knowledge of our history, of our great historical figures and events, of our identity values, of our ideals over time, which, through intelligence, diplomacy, struggle and sacrifice, we have also fulfilled. The Great Union is the apotheosis, the great lesson of our history, which must be taught to young people and learned by them. Young people must be taught the lesson of Romanian culture and civilization, through which they learn that we have given the world universal values in all fields of science, technique and technology, literature and art. They need to learn and know things of substance about Eminescu, Blaga, Mircea Eliade, Cioran, Eugen Ionescu, Brâncuși, Enescu, about Petrache Poenaru, Anghel Saligny, Aurel Vlaicu, Vuia, Coandă, Nicolae Paulescu, Vasilescu-Karpen, Gogu Constantinescu, Hermann Oberth, Ana Aslan, and so many others, a plethora of universal values. He should know that in Romania, not far from the centre of the capital, there is the most powerful laser in the world, the ELI project, which will reach its potential next spring, a world technological peak. These are topics and names that are not really on the agenda of today’s schools, let alone the media, which is dominated by other topics. If we tell young people all these things, if we guide them in the universe of this knowledge related to Romanian science, culture and civilization, they will understand that they are part of a nation that has given something to the world, that has made an important contribution to the development of universal civilization. Education, the knowledge of our fundamental, founding values, is the way to form national consciousness and identity. In this process, young people must be our top priority. This is the vision we promote, we share and on the basis of which we act as an institution, the Academy of Romanian Scientists. This is why we have also initiated the project “Dialogue of Generations – Meetings with High School Students”, which adds to our constant concerns in this regard.

The Centenary year awaits its apotheosis on the first day of December 2018. After that, inevitably, it will end. What do we do, as a society and a nation, after the Centenary? Will we think of 2018 as a fond memory or will we continue in the same spirit that defined it?
Adrian Badea: I like to think that 2018 means more than a celebration. I hope it will be the beginning of a moral and spiritual resurrection of our nation. The Centenary year has reactualised events, historical figures and meanings in a necessary act of awareness and assumption in a festive setting. I want us not to stop here, but to continue thinking and acting in the same spirit. I am talking about recovering our self-consciousness as a nation, as a people who have played an important role in history and who still have a mission to fulfil. I am thinking of affirming more strongly our identity in the concert of European diversity and, not least, our national dignity. We have everything we need as a nation to succeed in history: we have exceptional personalities and achievements, we have an important culture, we have an ancient, solid civilisation, European by definition. We have universal values, recognised, at least some of them, as such. We have very intelligent young people, and not from yesterday and today, who win gold medals and first places on international podiums in mathematics, computer science, science, knowledge, who emerge victorious in competition with competitors from China, USA, Russia, India, Japan, etc. We have a great potential for intelligence, which we must harness.

So what are we missing to be what we could be – a prosperous, strong and respected nation in the European Union and the world?
Adrian Badea:
We lack a stronger involvement of genuine elites from all fields in the work of rebuilding Romania in today’s world. We lack a vision that integrates all projects and resources into a country project or several fundamental country projects, in the medium and long term. We lack the cohesion to achieve these great projects, currently extremely divided. We need good people in all fields, we need educated, wise and visionary politicians. We also need more dignity, more patriotism and more love of country. When we have all these things, and I am confident that we will have them not very far in the future, then Romania will have a very serious chance of realising its potential and becoming what we want it to be, what it can and deserves to become. I am optimistic and I will tell you why: young people are coming from behind, young people of value, educated at Romanian universities and at great universities abroad, they come with a different mentality. They are the elite who will change Romania for the better, as we want. In this process, all of us, the entire Romanian nation, can and must play a role.

Interview taken from “Clipa” Magazine, December 2018

Deep sadness at the passing away of Brigadier General (r) Floriean TUCĂ, Corresponding Member, Military Sciences Section

0

Brigadier General Floriean TUCĂ, Corresponding Member, Military Sciences Section

12 August 1928. Curtea de Argeș – d. April 2022, Bucharest

The Academy of Romanian Scientists announces with deep sadness the passing away of Brigadier General (r) Floriean TUCĂ, Corresponding Member of the Military Sciences Section

Doctor in historical and philosophical sciences (1976), renowned novelist and novelist of military literature, General Floriean Tucă was director of the Military Publishing House, an expert in the field of historical monuments, in the historical study of Romanian state personalities from all eras.

Author of more than 2000 scientific communications, studies, articles, historical evocations, documentations for historical dictionaries, published in specialized journals or in the central press, he will remain in the heritage of historical and military sciences in Romania, of which we mention only a few titles: In Memory of Heroes, Bucharest, 1960; Historical Field of Marasti. History of the mausoleum at Mărăști, Bucharest, 1973; Places and Monuments of the Passo, Bucharest, 1978; Monuments of the war years. Dictionary, Bucharest, 1983; A flame pierces the ages. The Romanian Revolution of 1848-1849, Bucharest, 1998; Poezii e cântece pașoptiste, Bucharest, 1998; Legenda Mănăstirii Argeșului, Bucharest, 2002; The days and nights of a lumberjack. Autobiographical landmarksBucharest, 2004; Chronicles in Stone of Independence: “The Heroes of Grivița and Smârdan”, Bucharest, 1977; The Monuments of Struggle, Bucharest, 1985; For you they died, Sfântă Libertate, Bucharest, 1989; Craiul Mulților, Avram Iancu, Bucharest, 1993; Armand Călinescu’s Testament, Bucharest, 1994; The Liberation of the Last Romanian Land – Careii Mari, Bucharest, 1994; What cannot be forgotten: Five decades since the Romanian army’s battles for the liberation of Budapest, Bucharest, 1995; The tragic fate of Romanian monuments in Bucovina, Bucharest, 1995; The Eternal Romanian Land of Bessarabia, Bucharest, 1996; Why the peasants revolted in 1907, Bucharest, 1997; Monuments dedicated to the peasant uprising of 1907, historical documents in stone, Bucharest, 1997, Epopeea Anilor 1916-1918, Razboiul pentru Faurirea Romaniei Mari (co-author Romulus Raicu, 1998), Voivodes, rulers, princes, kings, presidents and other heads of state in the Romanian space (co-author Cristache Gheorghe) (2006).

We will always remember the professionalism, kindness, dedication to history and scientific studies of our former colleague, Brigadier General (r) Floriean TUCĂ.

God rest his soul!